MUMBAI: In a fresh affidavit filed before the National
Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Cyrus Mistry has said he was close to
finalizing a governance framework to clarify the role of Tata Trusts in the
affairs of Tata Sons when he was ousted as chairman of the group. Presenting
copies of mails and documents to establish that Ratan Tata was
"remotecontrolling" affairs of Tata Sons and influencing key
decisions of various group companies, his affidavit said, "The conduct of
(Ratan Tata) in particular, his insistence of being a super-board by wanting to
pre-vet and pre-decide what gets taken for formal approval to the board of Tata
Sons demonstrates that he was never happy with being an emeritus chairman but
saw himself as a chairman who never retired."
Ratan Tata became chairman emeritus of Tata Sons in December 2012 after he
relinquished his non-executive chairman position. Mistry's affidavit also said
that Nitin Nohria, one of the Tata Trusts nominee directors on the Tata
Sons board, was aware of interference by Tata Trusts and therefore volunteered
to draft a governance code clarifying the role of Tata Trusts in the affairs of
Tata Sons.
Tata Trusts, which is chaired by Ratan Tata, is the largest
shareholder in Tata Sons and was the force behind the decision to sack Mistry from
the chairmanship of Tata Sons in October last year. "I can certainly empathise with your
frustration about what items can be dealt with by the Tata Sons board and what
require prior approval of the trusts. These are the questions that my note also
seeks to get clarity on," said Nohria in a January 31 2015 email to
Mistry, according to the affidavit.
Another email dated February 4, 2015 from Nohria to Mistry
said, "The separation of leadership of Tata Trust and Tata Sons
is more significant than anyone has fully comprehended or internalized. Even
though the memorandum and articles of association provide some guidelines, they
have not been translated into operating practices that have everyone's buy-in.
I will send you the document I have been working on..." The affidavit said
when the Trusts' interference continued, Mistry decided to formulate his
version of a governance framework; a series of drafts were sent to Nohria.
Mistry said the document was also shared with Ratan Tata in
August 2016 and placed on the agenda for the October 24, 2016 Tata Sons board
meet. But Mistry said, instead of dealing with the issue, Ratan Tata staged a
coup by removing him. Mistry's family-owned firms, which hold over 18% stake in
Tata Sons, have moved NCLT citing mismanagement at Tata Sons and oppression of
minority shareholders. Mistry's affidavit also referred to "abuse and
misuse of the Articles of Association (AoA) of Tata Sons," saying his
family-owned firms agreed to amendments in the AoA on the premise that it would
enable Tata Trusts to bring on board individuals of standing.
No comments
Post a Comment